Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda 626 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 1998 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 1995 engine produces 24 HP less power than Mazda 626 1998, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Mazda 626 1998. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.2 | |
|
The Mazda 626 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 1995 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 1995 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 626 1998 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 626 1995 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 1995 is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 626 1998, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 1995 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 1998 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 1995 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1998. This could mean that the Mazda 626 1995 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1995 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 626 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |