Mazda 626 1995 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 60 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 132 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.3 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Alfa Romeo 166 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Mazda 626 has 48 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`710 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |