Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda 626 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 1995 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 1995 engine produces 16 HP more power than Mazda 626 1997, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mazda 626 1997. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.6 | |
| Mazda 626 1995 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1997, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 1995 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 1997 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 1997 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda 626 1995 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda 626 1995 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 1995 is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 626 1997, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 1995 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 1997 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 1995 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1997. This could mean that the Mazda 626 1995 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1995 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 626 1997. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |