Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 1995 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 have the same engine power, but Mazda 626 1995 torque is 1 NM more than Mazda 626 1991. Mazda 626 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1995 and Mazda 626 1991 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Mazda 626 1995 has 3 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1991. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |