Mazda 626 1997 vs Peugeot 406 1999

 
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Peugeot 406
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP90 HP
Torque: 170 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds14.6 seconds
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 626 engine produces 25 HP more power than Peugeot 406, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Peugeot 406. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.4
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 626 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1090 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.60 m
Width: 1.71 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 626 is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres430 litres
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Peugeot 406 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`685 kgno data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv