Mazda 626 1998 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 76 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 1998 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 1998 engine produces 24 HP more power than Mazda 626 1995, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Mazda 626 1995. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.8 | |
|
The Mazda 626 1998 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 1998 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1995, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 1998 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 1998 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 626 1998 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 626 1998 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 1998 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 626 1995, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 1998 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 1998 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 1998 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626 1995. The Mazda 626 1995 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1998 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 626 1995. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |