Mazda 626 1998 vs Audi A4 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 10 HP more power than Audi A4, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Audi A4. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 626 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 1998 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 10 cm longer than the Audi A4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 440 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 62 litres more trunk space than the Audi A4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A4, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mazda 626 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A4, so Mazda 626 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
| |