Mazda 626 1997 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 1995 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 1997 engine produces 16 HP less power than Mazda 626 1995, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Mazda 626 1995. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.4 | |
| Mazda 626 1997 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1995, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 1997 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 1997 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 1997 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 626 1995 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 626 1997 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 1997 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 626 1995, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 1997 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 1997 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 1997 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626 1995. The Mazda 626 1995 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1997 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 626 1995. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |