Mazda 626 2000 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 41 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Corolla engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Peugeot 206, Peugeot 306, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 27 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |