Mazda 626 2000 vs Mazda 6 2013
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 40 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda 626 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 225 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 626 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 1100 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 626 2000 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 21 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 502 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |