Mazda 626 1999 vs Mazda 323 2001
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 323 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Premacy, Mazda MPV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 34 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1000 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 147 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mazda 626 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 323, so Mazda 626 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |