Mazda 626 1999 vs Hyundai Elantra 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Elantra is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 28 HP less power than Hyundai Elantra, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Hyundai Elantra. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 626 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Elantra 2003 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Elantra 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 7 cm longer than the Hyundai Elantra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 87 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mazda 626 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai Elantra, so Mazda 626 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |