Mazda 626 1988 vs Toyota Corolla 1997

 
Mazda 626
1988 - 1990
Toyota Corolla
1997 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 109 HP107 HP
Torque: 165 NM141 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.4 seconds12.6 seconds
Mazda 626 engine produces 2 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Despite the higher power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.28.7
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 626 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 20 years15 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Celica
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.27 m
Width: 1.69 m1.69 m
Height: 1.46 m1.38 m
Mazda 626 is 32 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data372 litres
Turning diameter: no data9.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`600
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 22001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Toyota Corolla has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv