Mazda 626 1988 vs Mercedes E class 1989
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 165 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mazda 626 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mercedes E class. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 72 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 626) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 17 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 6600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |