Mazda 626 1988 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, but torque is 20 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.0 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 15 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 32 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |