Mazda 626 1992 vs Citroen Xantia 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 122 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 6 HP less power than Citroen Xantia, but torque is 4 NM more than Citroen Xantia. Despite less power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.3 | |
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Citroen Xantia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 626, so Citroen Xantia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |