Mazda 626 1992 vs Citroen Xantia 1995

 
Mazda 626
1992 - 1996
Citroen Xantia
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP122 HP
Torque: 180 NM176 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds14.8 seconds
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 626 engine produces 6 HP less power than Citroen Xantia, but torque is 4 NM more than Citroen Xantia. Despite less power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.810.3
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 626 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.66 m
Width: 1.69 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Mazda 626 is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 430 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1315 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7501`200
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Citroen Xantia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda 626, so Citroen Xantia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 600600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Citroen Xantia has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv