Mazda 626 1992 vs Audi 80 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 17 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 11 cm longer than the Audi 80, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi 80. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |