Mazda 626 1992 vs Audi A6 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 60 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 21 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. The Audi A6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |