Mazda 626 1992 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 50 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 11 cm longer than the Audi 80, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | 1200 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 60 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi 80. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |