Mazda 626 1992 vs Citroen Xantia 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xantia is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 45 HP less power than Citroen Xantia, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Citroen Xantia. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.4 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1315 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Citroen Xantia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xantia, so Citroen Xantia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |