Mazda 626 1998 vs Subaru Outback 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 94 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 6 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1649 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 13 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Outback. The Subaru Outback may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 28 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |