Mazda 626 1998 vs Subaru Legacy 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Mazda 626 engine produces 10 HP less power than Subaru Legacy, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Subaru Legacy. Despite less power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Legacy, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Legacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 2 cm shorter than the Subaru Legacy, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1677 litres | 1646 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Subaru Legacy, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`840 kg | 1`875 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`280 kg | 1`410 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 560 kg | 465 kg | |
| Mazda 626 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Subaru Legacy. Therefore, Mazda 626 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Subaru Legacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Subaru Legacy, so Subaru Legacy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Subaru Legacy has
| |