Mazda 626 1999 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.7 | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Used also on Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda 626 1999 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but lower. Mazda 626 is 38 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1848 litres | |
| Mazda 626 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`935 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |