Mazda 626 1999 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but lower. Mazda 626 is 38 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1677 litres | 1848 litres | |
| Mazda 626 has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |