Mazda 626 1991 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 3 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, but torque is 5 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Despite less power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.4 | |
| Mazda 626 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 25 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. The Mazda Xedos 9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1.9 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |