Mazda 626 1991 vs Mercedes E class 1989

 
Mazda 626
1991 - 1995
Mercedes E class
1989 - 1992
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 167 HP160 HP
Torque: 221 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds9 seconds
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda 626 engine produces 7 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.510.9
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda 626 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
600 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 626) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km630'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 9, Mazda MX-6Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.74 m
Width: 1.75 m1.74 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Mazda 626 is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
747 litresno data
Turning diameter: 9.6 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7351`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Mercedes E class has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 6002800
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mercedes E klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv