Mazda 626 1991 vs Mazda 626 1995

 
Mazda 626
1991 - 1995
Mazda 626
1995 - 1997
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 117 HP117 HP
Torque: 173 NM173 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds13.1 seconds
Mazda 626 1991 and Mazda 626 1995 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda 626 1991 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.3
Mazda 626 1991 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1995, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 1991 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 520'000 km520'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1991 and Mazda 626 1995 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres452 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
747 litresno data
Mazda 626 1991 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626 1995.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 600600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • more dynamic
Mazda 626 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv