Mazda 626 1991 vs Citroen Xantia 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xantia is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen Xantia, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Citroen Xantia. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.8 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 26 cm longer than the Citroen Xantia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mazda 626 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xantia, so Mazda 626 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |