Mazda 626 1991 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 46 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 38 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | 1360 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 has 95 litres less trunk space than the Seat Toledo. This could mean that the Mazda 626 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Toledo (by 613 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |