Mazda 626 1991 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 45 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 18 cm longer than the Fiat Croma, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |