Mazda 626 1992 vs Mazda 626 1995
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 HP | 76 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
Mazda 626 1992 and Mazda 626 1995 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 1992 and Mazda 626 1995 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 452 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
Mazda 626 1992 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626 1995. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`710 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |