Mazda 626 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 167 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 52 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.1 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 600'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 9, Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 38 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |