Mazda 626 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 106 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 158 NM | 158 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.0 | |
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
Mazda 626 is 14 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
747 litres | 1290 litres | |
Mazda 626 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 543 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |