Mazda 626 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Mazda 626
1995 - 1998
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 106 HP116 HP
Torque: 158 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 seconds11 seconds
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 626 engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.48.0
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda 626 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.56 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.37 m
Mazda 626 is 14 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
747 litres1290 litres
Mazda 626 has 5 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 543 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6751`790
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
Mazda 626 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 600600
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv