Mazda 626 1997 vs Kia Sephia 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda 626 engine produces 56 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Kia Sephia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.4 | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda 626 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 33 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mazda 626 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sephia has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |