Mazda 626 1997 vs Rover 400 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 21 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.6 | |
| Mazda 626 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Rover 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Rover 400 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 26 cm longer than the Rover 400, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 720 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 132 litres more trunk space than the Rover 400. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |