Mazda 626 1997 vs Fiat Brava 1995

 
Mazda 626
1997 - 1999
Fiat Brava
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 90 HP103 HP
Torque: 145 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.6 seconds11.5 seconds
Fiat Brava is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda 626 engine produces 13 HP less power than Fiat Brava, but torque is 1 NM more than Fiat Brava. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km8.2 l/100km
By specification Mazda 626 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Brava, which means that by driving the Mazda 626 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda 626 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Brava.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway750 km on highway
770 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda PremacyUsed also on Fiat Marea
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 626 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Fiat Brava engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.19 m
Width: 1.71 m1.74 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
Mazda 626 is 39 cm longer than the Fiat Brava, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 502 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data775 litres
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity.
Mazda 626 has 122 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Brava.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6801`630
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Mazda 626 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Brava has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 626, so Mazda 626 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000600
Pros and Cons: Mazda 626 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Fiat Brava has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv