Mazda 626 1999 vs Kia RIO 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 108 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda 626 engine produces 28 HP more power than Kia RIO, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Kia RIO. Thanks to more power Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.7 | |
| Mazda 626 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 is 38 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 499 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1277 litres | |
| Mazda 626 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Kia RIO, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Kia RIO has
| |