Mazda 626 1999 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 626 engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mazda 626 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 626 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 626 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 626 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 626 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise.
One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but lower. Mazda 626 is 79 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 275 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 227 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 625 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 10.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |