Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda 626 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 76 - 117 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
Torque: | 158 - 173 NM | 145 - 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | 9.9 - 12.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 8.3 | 5.2 - 8.5 | |
Mazda 626 1995 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626 1997. On average, Mazda 626 1995 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1997. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.70 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
Mazda 626 1995 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda 626 1995 is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 626 1997, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 1995 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 502 litres | |
Mazda 626 1997 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda 626 1995 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626 1997. This could mean that the Mazda 626 1995 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1995 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 626 1997. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`709 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |