Mazda 626 1995 vs Volvo S90 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mazda 626 is available with front wheel drive, while Volvo S90 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.9 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 117 HP | 180 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 173 NM | 260 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | 9 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 8.3 | 11.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mazda 626 is 17 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |