Mazda 626 1995 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 117 HP | 146 - 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 173 NM | 180 - 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 8.3 | 8.4 - 9.4 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Xedos 9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 has 22 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. The Mazda Xedos 9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`951 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |