Mazda 626 1995 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 117 HP | 72 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 173 NM | 104 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | 11.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 8.3 | 5.5 - 7.6 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Aveo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger, but lower. Mazda 626 is 40 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 375 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 77 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`663 | ~ 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |