Mazda 626 1995 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 76 - 117 HP | 136 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 158 - 173 NM | 187 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | 7.8 - 9.9 seconds | |
| In general, Alfa Romeo 166 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 626. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 8.3 | 7.3 - 13.0 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 166. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 166, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Mazda 626 has 48 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`663 kg | ~ 1`995 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |