Mazda 626 1997 vs Toyota Camry 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 626 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 115 HP | 152 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 218 - 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.6 seconds | 9.1 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.5 | 8.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`709 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |