Mazda 626 1997 vs Mazda 626 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 115 HP | 76 - 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 158 - 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.6 seconds | 10.7 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.5 | 6.8 - 8.3 | |
|
Mazda 626 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626 1995. On average, Mazda 626 1997 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626 1995. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda 626 1997 is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda 626 1997 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 626 1995, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 1997 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 1997 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda 626 1997 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 626 1995. The Mazda 626 1995 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 1997 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 626 1995. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`709 | ~ 1`663 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |