Mazda 626 1997 vs Honda Civic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 115 HP | 90 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 - 220 NM | 124 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 12.6 seconds | 8.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.5 | 6.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 12 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 410 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 92 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`709 | ~ 1`594 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.7/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |