Mazda 626 1999 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 167 HP | 69 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 125 - 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | 10 - 15.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 6.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is larger. Mazda 626 is 27 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 626 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 473 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mazda 626 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`648 | ~ 1`664 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |