Mazda 626 1999 vs Mazda 6 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 167 HP | 145 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mazda 626 is smaller. Mazda 626 is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 626 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 502 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`648 | ~ 2`038 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |