Mazda 626 1999 vs Peugeot 406 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.7 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 167 HP | 90 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 147 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | 8 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.9 | 5.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 406. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mazda 626 and Peugeot 406 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity. Mazda 626 has 72 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 406. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`648 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 626 has
|
Peugeot 406 has
| |