Mazda 626 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
- choose version -
Mazda 626 1.8 | 100 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mazda 626 2.0 | 115 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mazda 626 2.0 Automatic | 115 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mazda 626 2.0 DiTD 100 Hp | 100 HP | Diesel | Manual
Mazda 626 2.0 DiTD 110 Hp | 110 HP | Diesel | Manual
Mazda 626 2.0hp | 136 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mazda 626 2.0hp Automatic | 136 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mazda 626 2.5 V6 | 167 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C class
2004 - 2007
- choose version -
Mercedes C 180 2004 Kompressor | 143 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 180 2004 Kompressor | 143 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 200 2004 CDI | 122 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Mercedes C 200 2004 CDI | 122 HP | Diesel | Manual
Mercedes C 200 2004 Kompressor | 163 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 200 2004 Kompressor | 163 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 220 2004 CDI | 150 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Mercedes C 220 2004 CDI | 150 HP | Diesel | Manual
Mercedes C 230 2005 | 204 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 230 2005 | 204 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 230 2004 Kompressor | 192 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 230 2004 Kompressor | 192 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 240 2004 | 170 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 240 2004 | 170 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 240 2004 4Matic | 170 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Mercedes C 270 2004 CDI | 170 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Mercedes C 270 2004 CDI | 170 HP | Diesel | Manual
Mercedes C 280 2005 | 231 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 280 2005 | 231 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 280 2005 4Matic | 231 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Mercedes C 30 2004 CDI AMG | 231 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Mercedes C 320 2004 | 218 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 320 2004 | 218 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 320 2004 4Matic | 218 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Mercedes C 320 2005 CDI | 224 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Mercedes C 320 2005 CDI | 224 HP | Diesel | Manual
Mercedes C 350 2005 | 272 HP | Petrol | Manual
Mercedes C 350 2005 | 272 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Mercedes C 350 2005 4Matic | 272 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
Mercedes C 55 2004 AMG | 367 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Gearbox:
Manual/Automatic Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:
Front wheel drive (FWD) Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mazda 626 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:
1.8 - 2.5 1.8 - 5.4
Performance
Power:
100 - 167 HP 122 - 367 HP
Torque:
152 - 230 NM 220 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:
9.3 - 12.5 seconds 5.2 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.2 - 8.9 6.1 - 11.9
Mazda 626 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Mazda 626 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. select the car version ! Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption " to learn more about fuel economy.
Dimensions
Length:
4.61 m 4.53 m
Width:
1.72 m 1.73 m
Height:
1.43 m 1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 626 is 8 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:
502 litres 455 litres
Mazda 626 has more luggage capacity.
Turning diameter:
10.4 meters 10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda 626 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Mazda 626 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):
~ 1`648 ~ 1`629
Safety:
no data no data
Quality:
above average average
Average price (€):
1000 3000
Rating in user reviews:
6.2 /10
7.4 /10
Pros and Cons:
Mazda 626 has
lower fuel consumption roomier boot fewer faults lower price
Mercedes C klase has
available with 4x4 drive higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
